Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
:Abundance and food consumption of shrews in the European part of the southern taiga (Valdai district, Russia) were investigated. Average population densities of these animals were estimated 31/ha in dry boreal spruce forest, 179 in boreal Picea abies – Oxalis acetosella forest, and 224–258 in rich spruce forest. Food consumption in those habitats was estimated at 25 kg/ha, 152 kg/ha, and 212–244 kg/ha per year, respectively. These data are similar to those for western Siberian taiga (132–264 kg/ha), mixed forest in the Russian Far-East (177–351 kg/ha), and larch forests in north-east Siberia (265–330 kg/ha). These figures also correspond with the biomass of soil invertebrates in the above ecosystems. This provides evidence that shrews have a significant impact on litter decay processes. In particular, shrews diminish the population density of soil invertebrates thus increasing their productivity. Such a response to harvesting is well-known for many populations, from microorganisms to ungulates. Red-toothed shrews do not significantly change the density of soil invertebrates during summer periods, but they probably accelerate decomposition of forest litter and organic matter in the upper soil layers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shvarts et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: