Key result
ECLS with apical venting enables full cardiac recovery in recurrent immune-mediated fulminant myocarditis.
Case Report (n=1)
This case highlights that major infections such as pneumonia or COVID-19 may trigger or reactivate recurrent autoimmune fulminant myocarditis in predisposed individuals.
Recurrence possible years after full recovery; leaves open optimal long-term surveillance and immunosuppression strategies.
We report a unique case of a young woman with recurrent immune-mediated (virus-negative) lymphocytic fulminant myocarditis during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. At the first endomyocardial biopsy (EMB)-proven episode, she had concomitant pneumonia, and a temporary biventricular assist device implant was followed by complete and long-lasting cardiac recovery. Five years later, she was re-admitted for relapsing cardiogenic shock with a recent history of pneumonia. She was treated with extracorporeal life support with apical venting for left ventricular unloading, and full recovery was achieved. Despite negative seriate nasopharyngeal swabs and EMB during hospitalization, an antibody positivity for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was discovered after 4 weeks from discharge. This is the first report of an EMB-proven, immune-mediated (virus-negative) recurrence of fulminant myocarditis. We hypothesize that in patients with a predisposing immunogenetic background, autoimmune disease may be triggered or reactivated by major infections, for example, pneumonia, that may act as adjuvants leading to an immune-mediated hyper-response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caraffa et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Recurrent immune-mediated (virus-negative) lymphocytic fulminant myocarditis (n=1). Extracorporeal life support with apical venting was evaluated on Cardiac recovery. A young woman with recurrent immune-mediated fulminant myocarditis achieved full recovery following treatment with extracorporeal life support and apical venting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: