Substructure identification is a structural health monitoring technique that identifies a reduced-order model of structural behavior using local vibration measurements. The authors’ prior research on this inherently decentralized technique demonstrated that substructure identification can detect and localize stiffness changes in a shear building. However, identification performance varies from story to story, with parameters of a few stories not satisfactorily identified. To overcome this limitation, the authors and colleagues showed that a structural control device can be used to temporarily change the dynamics of the structure to improve identification performance; however, prior studies assumed full-state feedback, which is not achievable in full-scale implementations. This paper investigates structural control using limited sensor measurements to improve substructure identification. The substructure method is first summarized, followed by an error analysis that can predict a priori the level of error in story parameter estimates. Then, a novel controlled substructure identification procedure is introduced with constraints to ensure that the controlled responses improve substructure identification while reducing overall structural response. State feedback is utilized, with a Kalman filter to estimate states using various sets of acceleration sensor measurements to understand the performance trade-offs. The implementation methodology using an object-oriented programing paradigm is explained; a 3.66-m (12-ft) four-story single-bay steel structure model, subject to low levels of ground motion, is the test bed used for numerical simulations to demonstrate the proposed methodology. The control strategies that include a sensor measuring ground acceleration are shown to be nearly as effective in estimating stiffnesses as the full-state feedback control and all controlled strategies perform better than the uncontrolled case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeVore et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: