Key result
Echo-guided early surgery in infective endocarditis is cost-effective at ~$24,000 per QALY gained.
Why the study?
Few investigators have evaluated the utility of echocardiography as a risk-stratification tool to aid therapeutic decision-making in infective endocarditis.
Is an echocardiography-guided strategy for early surgery cost-effective compared to standard care in patients with infective endocarditis?
Is an echocardiography-guided strategy for early surgery cost-effective compared to standard care in patients with infective endocarditis?
Echocardiography-guided risk stratification for early surgery in patients with infective endocarditis and large vegetations is a cost-effective treatment strategy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support echocardiography-guided early surgery decisions in infective endocarditis; leaves open need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread acceptance of echocardiography for diagnosis of infective endocarditis, few investigators have evaluated its utility as a risk-stratification tool to aid therapeutic decision-making. METHODS: A decision tree and Markov analysis model were constructed using published and institutional data to estimate the cost-effectiveness of an echocardiographic risk-stratification strategy for infective endocarditis. The models compared surgery for high-risk patients based on clinical factors ("standard care") and surgery for high-risk patients based on echocardiographic findings ("echocardiography-guided"). RESULTS: The cost per patient for standard care and echocardiography-guided strategies was $47,766 and $53,669, respectively. The expected quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for standard care and echocardiography-guided strategies were 5.86 years and 6.10 years, respectively. Compared with standard care, the echocardiography-guided strategy cost an additional $23,867 per QALY saved. In one-way sensitivity analyses, the incremental cost of this strategy remained <$50,000/QALY across a broad range of scenarios. Baseline stroke risk had the greatest effect on cost-effectiveness. For populations with stroke risk less than 3.65%, the echocardiography-guided strategy was not cost-attractive (ICER >$50,000/QALY). At stroke risk between 3.65% and 14%, the ICER for the echocardiography-guided strategy was attractive (<$50,000 /QALY). The echocardiography-guided strategy became economically dominant at any baseline stroke risk greater than 18.3%. CONCLUSION: Echo-guided risk stratification for early surgery in patients with large vegetations is a cost-attractive treatment strategy for IE, as it improves outcome for an incremental cost <$50,000/QALY.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2007) studied Infective endocarditis. Echocardiography-guided surgery for high-risk patients vs. Surgery for high-risk patients based on clinical factors (standard care) was evaluated on Cost-effectiveness (cost per QALY saved) (ICER $23,867 per QALY saved). Echocardiography-guided risk stratification for early surgery in infective endocarditis was cost-effective compared to standard care, costing an additional $23,867 per QALY saved.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: