This paper develops a challenge to theism. The challenge is to explain why the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-good god should be considered significantly more reasonable than the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-evil god. Theists typically dismiss the evil-god hypothesis out of hand because of theproblem of good– there is surely too much good in the world for it to be the creation of such a being. But then why doesn't the problem of evil provide equally good grounds for dismissing belief in a good god? I develop thisevil-god challengein detail, anticipate several replies, and correct errors made in earlier discussions of the problem of good.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen Law (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: