Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transparent platelet‐shaped green single crystals of the title compound were obtained by the reaction of cesium bromide, praseodymium, sulfur, and red phosphorus in the molar ratio 1:2:8:2 with an excess of CsBr as flux in evacuated silica ampoules at 950 °C for fourteen days. Cs 3 Pr 5 [PS 4 ] 6 crystallizes monoclinically in the space group C2/c (a = 1627.78(7), b = 1315.09(6), c = 2110.45(9) pm, β = 103.276(5)°; Z = 4). Its crystal structure is different from all the other alkali‐metal containing ortho ‐thiophosphates of the lanthanides, since it is not possible to formulate a layer containing the praseodymium centered sulfur polyhedra ([PrS 8 ] 13— , d(Pr—S) = 286 — 307 pm) and the isolated [PS 4 ] 3— tetrahedra (d(P—S) = 202 — 207 pm, ∢(S—P—S) = 104 — 106°). All these tetrahedra are edge‐sharing with the metal polyhedra to build up a framework instead. The coordination sphere of the half occupied (Cs2) + cations (CN = 10 + 2 ) can be described as two six‐membered sulfur rings in chair conformation containing a “cesium‐pair” in the middle. In contrast the (Cs1) + cations are surrounded in the not unusual configuration of tetracapped trigonal prisms (CN = 10, better 10 + 2 as well).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komm et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: