Key result
Deep inspiratory breath hold linked to ~54% lower mean heart dose in left-breast radiotherapy.
Why the study?
Different radiation therapy techniques have been studied to reduce cardiac dose in left-sided breast cancer, but comparative dosimetric data between FB and DIBH in 3DCRT and IMRT are needed.
Does deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) reduce radiation dose to the heart and other organs at risk compared to free-breathing in patients with left-sided breast cancer?
Observational (n=15)
Does deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) reduce radiation dose to the heart and other organs at risk compared to free-breathing in patients with left-sided breast cancer?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.3% vs 7.1%
Deep inspiratory breath hold with 3DCRT significantly reduces radiation dose to the heart and LAD in left-sided breast cancer patients without requiring IMRT.
DIBH may reduce cardiac doses in left-sided breast cancer; leaves open whether routine adoption improves outcomes.
Introduction: Different techniques of radiation therapy have been studied to reduce the cardiac dose in left breast cancer. Aim: In this prospective dosimetric study, the doses to heart as well as other organs at risk (OAR) were compared between free-breathing (FB) and deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) techniques in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and opposed-tangent three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent computed tomography simulation and images were obtained in both FB and DIBH. Radiotherapy plans were generated with 3DCRT and IMRT techniques in FB and DIBH images in each patient. Target coverage, conformity index, homogeneity index , and mean dose to heart (Heart Dmean), left lung, left anterior descending artery (LAD) and right breast were compared between the four plans using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Target coverage was adequate with both 3DCRT and IMRT plans, but IMRT plans showed better conformity and homogeneity. A statistically significant dose reduction of all OARs was found with DIBH. 3DCRTDIBHdecreased the Heart Dmeanby 53.5% (7.1 vs. 3.3 Gy) and mean dose to LAD by 28% compared to 3DCRTFB. IMRT further lowered mean LAD dose by 18%. Heart Dmeanwas lower with 3DCRTDIBHover IMRTDIBH (3.3 vs. 10.2 Gy). Mean dose to the contralateral breast was also lower with 3DCRT over IMRT (0.32 vs. 3.35 Gy). Mean dose and the V20of ipsilateral lung were lower with 3DCRTDIBHover IMRTDIBH (13.78 vs. 18.9 Gy) and (25.16 vs. 32.95%), respectively. Conclusions: 3DCRTDIBHprovided excellent dosimetric results in patients with left-sided breast cancer without the need for IMRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sripathi et al. (2017) conducted an observational in left-sided breast cancer (n=15). Deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) technique vs. Free-breathing (FB) technique was evaluated on Mean dose to heart (Heart Dmean). Deep inspiratory breath hold with 3DCRT decreased the mean heart dose by 53.5% (3.3 vs. 7.1 Gy) compared to free-breathing 3DCRT in patients with left-sided breast cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: