Key result
Electrical stimulation methods, including transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, show great potential for regulating external respiration in patients with respiratory muscle paresis.
This review highlights the potential of various electrical stimulation methods, particularly transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, for regulating respiration in patients with respiratory muscle paresis.
The review addresses modern methods of electrical stimulation used to regulate the function of external respiration in humans. The methods include abdominal functional stimulation of respiratory muscles, diaphragmatic stimulation, phrenic nerve stimulation, epidural and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. The physiological rationale of their application is described along with the examples of their use in clinical practice, including stimulation parameters and electrode placement diagrams for each of the methods. We analyze the effectiveness of each of the methods in patients with respiratory muscle paresis and the features of their use depending on the level of spinal cord injury. Special attention is paid to the method of epidural spinal cord stimulation because this technique is widely used in electrophysiological studies on animal models, providing deeper insight into the spinal levels of the functional control of external respiration. The review substantiates the great potential of using the method of transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation both in fundamental studies of external respiration and in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shandybina et al. (2022) conducted a review in Respiratory muscle paresis and spinal cord injury. Electrical stimulation methods (abdominal, diaphragmatic, phrenic nerve, epidural, and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation) was evaluated. Electrical stimulation methods, including transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, show great potential for regulating external respiration in patients with respiratory muscle paresis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: