The compositional variation of the non‐reversing enthalpy at T g , Δ H nr ( x ), in Ge x Se 100− x glasses decreases abruptly by an order of magnitude as x increases to x c (1) = 19.5(5)%, the rigidity transition, and then remains minuscule till x increases to x c (2) = 26.0(5)%, when the term abruptly increases by an order of magnitude as glasses become stressed‐rigid. The rigid but unstressed networks formed in between these two transitions represent the Intermediate Phase ( IP ). The square‐well like variation of Δ H nr ( x ), also known as the reversibility window develops sloping walls, then a triangular shape and eventually disappears as glasses of increasing heterogeneity are studied. The Δ H nr term ages over weeks outside the IP but not inside the IP . Raman line shapes of as‐quenched melts are quite similar to those of T g ‐cycled glasses for compositions in the IP , but not outside the IP – an optical analog of the thermal reversibility window. Variations of Molar volumes, display a global minimum in the IP and a pronounced increase outside that phase. Physical behavior of dry and homogeneous chalcogenide glasses that leads to sharp elastic and chemical phase transitions remains to be understood theoretically. The physics of network may be even more interesting than hitherto recognized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhosle et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: