Key result
OAC fails to significantly reduce thromboembolic events in patients with atrial high-rate episodes.
Why the study?
Although AHREs are associated with higher risk of incident AF and thromboembolic events, their clinical significance and impact of OAC therapy remain unclear.
Does oral anticoagulation reduce thromboembolic events in patients with atrial high-rate episodes?
Cohort (n=154)
No
Does oral anticoagulation reduce thromboembolic events in patients with atrial high-rate episodes?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.3% vs 7.8%
p-value: p=0.05
In patients with atrial high-rate episodes, oral anticoagulation was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in thromboembolic events or increase in major bleeding, though event rates were low.
Anticoagulation was not associated with fewer thromboembolic events in atrial high-rate episodes; leaves open the need for randomized trials.
Background Although previous studies showed that atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) are associated with a higher risk of developing incident atrial fibrillation (AF) and thromboembolic events, their clinical significance is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to define whether there is any clinical impact on the occurrence of ischemic and hemorrhagic events in patients with AHREs and initiation of oral anticoagulation (OAC). Methodology Patients with AHREs who had received cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs, i.e., dual-chamber pacemaker [PM] or implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD]) were included in the study. OAC initiation was decided by the assistant doctor. Patients who received OACs comprised the OAC group, while patients who were not referred for OAC initiation were included in the control group. The primary endpoint was the time to the event of the occurrence of thromboembolic events (thromboembolic event-free survival). Results A total of 154 individuals (77 in each group) were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 72.5 years. The mean follow-up period for the OAC group was 19.1 months and for the control group, 18.9 months (P = 0.9). Thromboembolic events were noticed only in seven patients. Six of them were in the control group, and only one in the OAC group (P = 0.05). Major bleeding events were noticed in five patients, one of whom was in the control group and the rest in the OAC group (P = 0.17). Conclusions OAC therapy in patients with AHREs was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Baseline patient characteristics and AHRE duration may be useful to intensify the monitoring and management of patients with AHREs. Bleeding events may be indicators of cancer in patients with AHREs receiving OACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dimou et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial High-Rate Episodes (n=154). Oral Anticoagulation vs. No oral anticoagulation was evaluated on Time to the occurrence of thromboembolic events (thromboembolic event-free survival) (p=0.05). Oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial high-rate episodes did not significantly reduce the risk of thromboembolic events compared to no anticoagulation (1.3% vs 7.8%, p=0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: