Key result
Process analytical technology harvest triggers reduced the standard deviation of harvest yield by up to 71% compared to traditional time-based harvests, improving batch-to-batch consistency.
Process analytical technology triggers significantly improve batch-to-batch consistency and viral titer yield in live virus vaccine production compared to traditional time-based harvesting.
Model-guided harvest timing may boost live-virus titers; leaves open scale-up validation of PAT integration.
For bioprocesses producing live virus, such as enterovirus Coxsackievirus A21, viral titer (infectivity basis) decay rates can exceed 30% within a day. Consequently, harvest timing is paramount. To optimize titer at harvest, a continuous viral product titer model was generated to elucidate kinetics. The model leveraged experimentally determined viable cell density, cell-specific viral productivity, and viral specific decay rates. Next, three separate online process analytical technology (PAT) harvest triggers were developed to predict maximal viral titer. Finally, the PAT harvest triggers were tested alongside traditional time-based harvests. The harvest triggers utilized common bioprocessing tools - dissolved oxygen (DO) and capacitance probes - to track DO and viable cell volume (VCV) and derived a third parameter, cell-specific oxygen uptake rate. Harvesting with PAT triggers allowed for significantly improved batch-to-batch consistency. The standard deviation of harvest yield was reduced by 41% (DO), 56% (OUR) and 71% (capacitance) as compared to the industry standard time-based harvest. Even when a process deviation in inoculated cell density occurred, causing a significant shift in viral titer kinetics, the PAT harvest triggers yielded greater than 87% of peak titer. By comparison, the time-based harvest yielded 16%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blanda et al. (2025) studied Live virus vaccine production (enterovirus Coxsackievirus A21). Process analytical technology (PAT) harvest triggers vs. Traditional time-based harvests was evaluated on Standard deviation of harvest yield (Reduced by 41% (DO), 56% (OUR) and 71% (capacitance)). Process analytical technology harvest triggers reduced the standard deviation of harvest yield by up to 71% compared to traditional time-based harvests, improving batch-to-batch consistency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: