Interface defects are one of the main factors for inefficient photoelectric conversion of nanocomposites, which is also suitable for the photocatalytic nanosystem containing photosensitizers and co-catalysts, so the efficient passivation of interface defects can enhance their photocatalytic performance. In this work, P-doped C 3 N 4 (P–C 3 N 4 ) was prepared by the thermal polymerization of urea with phytic acid as the P doping source. Then, the doped P atoms could act as anchoring sites for photodeposited Ni nanoparticles (NPs) on P–C 3 N 4, and Ni–P–N bonds were spontaneously formed between Ni NPs and P–C 3 N 4 with doped P as the bridging ligand. The optimal H 2 evolution rate of P–C 3 N 4 /Ni-20 is 1.56 mmol g –1 h –1, which is 52.0 and 6.0 times that of C 3 N 4 and C 3 N 4 /Ni-30, respectively, and even 2.0 times that of P–C 3 N 4 /Pt-2%. Its apparent quantum efficiency of 4.35% at 420 nm was 6.9 times that of reference C 3 N 4 /Ni-30 without P doping. The optimized interface transfer of carriers by the formed Ni–P–N bonds between P–C 3 N 4 and Ni NPs was the main factor for the enhanced photocatalytic performance of C 3 N 4 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: