This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common gut–brain interaction disorder with suboptimal response to pharmacotherapy. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), a non-invasive neuromodulation targeting the vagus nerve, has emerged as a promising brain–gut axis therapy. This scoping review (PRISMA-ScR, JBI methodology) synthesizes clinical and preclinical mechanistic evidence on taVNS for FD. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to December 20, 2025, following PRISMA-ScR. Using PICOS (adults with FD; taVNS; sham/non-vagal/active controls; symptoms, gastric function, psychological outcomes, biomarkers; RCTs/clinical trials and controlled animal studies), two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed bias (RoB2 for RCTs, SYRCLE for animal studies). A narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity. Results Four RCTs ( n = 480) and eight preclinical rodent studies met inclusion. All RCTs showed significant improvements in dyspeptic symptoms, gastric accommodation, slow-wave normalization, and comorbid anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance versus sham/non-vagal control, sustained for 4–12 weeks. Stimulation parameters varied (10–30 Hz; 0.5–10 mA; 2–4 weeks); risk of bias low-moderate. Preclinical rodent evidence supported five interconnected candidate mechanisms: (i) autonomic balance and cholinergic modulation; (ii) α7nAChR/NF-κB anti-inflammatory pathway with duodenal barrier restoration; (iii) NGF/TrkA/PLC-γ/TRPV1-mediated visceral hypersensitivity suppression; (iv) HPA axis inhibition; (v) rebalancing of brain-gut peptides (motilin, CCK, GLP-1). Conclusion This review characterizes taVNS as a safe, well-tolerated, mechanistically plausible non-invasive neuromodulation for FD acting on multiple brain–gut axis nodes. However, the small number of trials, parameter heterogeneity, and limited follow-up constrain definitive conclusions. Adequately powered, multicenter RCTs with standardized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm efficacy and define optimal regimens.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: