Healthcare systems are responsible for a significant proportion of global greenhouse gas emissions. Trauma and orthopaedics has an exceptionally high emission profile in comparison to other specialities. This systematic review synthesises the available literature regarding the impact of virtual care/telemedicine on the carbon footprint of outpatient orthopaedics. Nine studies, encompassing over 500,000 patients, were included following a search across major databases. Virtual care has consistently been shown to have a smaller carbon footprint than traditional in-person appointments, primarily by reducing patient travel, resulting in a median reduction of 11.8 kgCO₂e per patient interaction. Secondary benefits, such as patient cost savings and improved accessibility, were also observed. However, the certainty of evidence was low due to the risk of bias across the studies; future research should aim to directly measure patient travel and other associated emissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee-Smith et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: