Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Expert commentary evaluates an inactivated rabies virus vectored vaccine in mice and camelids, highlighting its potential to elicit protective immunity against MERS-CoV.
Induces Protective Immunity in Mice, Camels, and Alpacas (doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.823949), was recently published in Frontiers in Immunology (Section: Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics) (1). In this study, Chi et al. constructed a chimeric rabies virus (RABV) that expressed a genetically modified S1 gene from the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and then evaluated its potential of virus-vectored vaccine after inactivation in different animals. This study demonstrated that the inactivated S1-expressing RABV was a promising vaccine candidate against MERS-CoV for camelids. Here, we would like to express our scientific opinions on this study.MERS is a severe infectious disease caused by MERS-CoV, initially identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012 (2). Typical signs clinically include fever, cough and shortness of breath in humans.MERS-CoV is a zoonotic virus, which has been identified in dromedary camels in several Member States in the Middle East, Africa and South Asia (3). There are a number of candidate vaccines that have been reported against MERS-CoV, including nucleic acid vaccine (4), subunit vaccine (5), nanoparticle vaccine (6), virus-vectored vaccine (7), and even live-attenuated vaccine (8). Most of the candidate vaccines have been designed using the MERS-CoV S protein, especially the S1 subunit.RABV virion is a bullet-shaped particle, containing a single-stranded, negative-sense RNA genome, coding for five proteins in order: nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix protein (M), glycoprotein (G), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (L). The RABV can be genetically modified using reverse genetics, whereby a foreign sequence can be inserted into the RABV genome for rescuing a replication-competent chimeric virus (9). This genetically modified RABV, if demonstrated to be able of expressing a foreign antigen that induces immune responses in vivo, would play a potential role in the development of RABV-vectored vaccines, such as live-attenuated vaccines (10)(11), inactivated vaccines (12-13) and replication-deficient vaccines (14)(15).The inactivated RABV-vectored vaccine (IRVV) is a killed version of antigen-expressing RABV, rescued from its cDNA clone using reverse genetics. The development of an IRVV involves the construction of a chimeric RABV cDNA clone, which contains a foreign gene for virus recovery. More importantly, it must be ensured that the target antigen can be incorporated into the envelope of RABV virion (16). The foreign sequence-containing genome and the foreign antigen-containing virion are schematically shown in Figure 1A andB, respectively. Some RABV-expressed antigens will be processed, transported to the cell surface, and finally, as membrane-spanning proteins, embedded into the cellular envelope. Along with budding of RABV virion, the foreign antigen can be incorporated into the viral envelope (13,17). Compared with the live-attenuated vaccine, the IRVV shows a good safety profile in vivo, as evidenced by neither virus mutation nor virulence reversion occurring in IRVV-vaccinated animals.A chimeric RABV, albeit chemically inactivated, can even completely retain its immunogenicity, eliciting not only the anti-RABV immune response, but also more significantly, high-level antibodies against a target pathogen. In the study conducted by Chi et al., the rSRV9-MERS S1 -inoculated mice, camels and alpacas were independently demonstrated to be able of secreting MERS-CoV-specific antibodies, implying its ability to inhibit the MERS-CoV infection in animals.It has been widely demonstrated that inactivated chimeric RABVs have promising potentials in developing IRVVs (1,(12)(13)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), whereas there are still a few disadvantages to them. For example, IRVVs may be less efficient than live-attenuated RABV-vectored vaccines in immunogenicity. The latter can elicit so potent immune response that a single dose is sufficient for the vaccination of animals, whereas the former are generally involved in the prime-boost vaccination (24)(25). In order to obtain MERS-CoV-specific antibodies at a high level, mice, MERS-CoV has been still regarded as an emerging virus. Although various anti-MERS-CoV candidate vaccines have been recently reported, none of them has been commercially available as yet. In the field of virus-vectored vaccines, Chi et al. carried out their study that was valuable for guiding the development of IRVV. In conclusion, the inactivated rSRV9-MERS S1 was safe for the vaccine-inoculated animals, and induced potent immune responses in vivo. Therefore, this study will pave the way for the construction of virus-vectored vaccines against MERS-CoV in future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: