Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antarctic shipping emissions are currently unregulated despite occurring in a sensitive environmental and geopolitical context. While previous studies have estimated tourism-related emissions, they lack the vessel type and spatial resolution necessary for effective mitigation strategies. This study integrates high-resolution Automatic Identification System (AIS) data with power-based modelling to quantify CO 2 emissions from all ship classes operating in the Southern Ocean between 2019 and 2022. The findings reveal that ships operating south of 60°S emitted 0.63 million tonnes of CO 2 , with icebreakers (43.9 %), passenger vessels (28.7 %), and fishing ships (16.3 %) as the dominant contributors. Emissions were concentrated in the Antarctic Peninsula (60 %) and the Ross Sea (10 %), both critical biodiversity zones. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a 98 % reduction in tourism emissions in 2020–2021, while fishing ships remained largely unaffected, underscoring the sector's resilience to external disruptions. Four nations—the United States, Russia, Norway, and China—accounted for about 48 % of total emissions, highlighting disparities in polar operational footprints. These findings underscore the need for coordinated policy interventions, including region-specific emission regulations and strengthened clean fuel mandates under the IMO Polar Code, with the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS)-facilitated collaboration to advance national legislative and regulatory alignment—measures collectively aimed to align Antarctic shipping practices with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: