Key result
Transcranial Doppler velocity drops of ≥70% during carotid clamping trigger unnecessary shunting.
Why the study?
The study tested whether a 70% or more drop in systolic blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery by transcranial Doppler better detects internal carotid artery cross-clamp intolerance than EEG and SSEP monitoring.
Is a drop of ≥70% in systolic blood flow velocity measured by transcranial Doppler a better criterion for detecting internal carotid artery cross-clamp intolerance than EEG and SSEP monitoring?
Observational (n=85)
Is a drop of ≥70% in systolic blood flow velocity measured by transcranial Doppler a better criterion for detecting internal carotid artery cross-clamp intolerance than EEG and SSEP monitoring?
Using a drop of 70% or more in middle cerebral artery systolic blood flow velocity measured by transcranial Doppler during carotid cross-clamping is not a reliable indicator of intolerance and may lead to unnecessary shunting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TCD 70% MCA velocity drop may prompt unnecessary shunting in carotid surgery; leaves open whether optimized TCD criteria outperform EEG/SSEP.
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that a drop in the systolic blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery of 70% or more, measured by transcranial Doppler, is a better criteria in the detection of cross-clamp intolerance than electroencephalogram (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring. After exclusion of patients with a recent stroke, urgent procedures and combined procedures, a transcranial Doppler with compression test was scheduled in 85 patients. In 13 patients the drop was 70% or more and in these patients a transcranial Doppler was also performed during the reconstruction of the internal carotid artery (the study group) under general anaesthesia. A shunt was used because of EEG and SSEP abnormality in one patient. No changes were observed in the remaining patients and no intraoperative strokes were seen. The transcranial Doppler monitoring was unreliable in three patients. During cross-clamp, the systolic blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery dropped less than 70% in four and 70% or more in six patients. It is concluded that using a drop of 70% or more of the systolic blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery during internal carotid artery cross-clamp, as an indicator of cross-clamp intolerance, will lead to unnecessary shunting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lacroix et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Internal carotid artery cross-clamp intolerance (n=85). Transcranial Doppler monitoring (≥70% drop in systolic blood flow velocity) vs. Electroencephalogram (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring was evaluated on Detection of cross-clamp intolerance. Using a drop of 70% or more in systolic blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery during internal carotid artery cross-clamp as an indicator of intolerance leads to unnecessary shunting.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: