Key result
Delayed CTA contrast arrival is linked to ~23% higher odds of RV dysfunction in PE.
Why the study?
The diagnostic accuracy of time-intensity curves from automated contrast bolus tracking in CTA to identify right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism was unclear.
Can time-intensity curve parameters from CTA bolus tracking systems accurately identify right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Observational (n=114)
No
Can time-intensity curve parameters from CTA bolus tracking systems accurately identify right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
While time-intensity curve parameters from CTA bolus tracking differ in patients with right ventricular dysfunction, their overall diagnostic performance is too low for reliable clinical use in acute pulmonary embolism.
Should not yet guide RV dysfunction assessment in acute PE; leaves open whether CTA time-intensity parameters can be refined for diagnostic use.
OBJECTIVE: To optimize enhancement of pulmonary arteries and facilitate diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), modern computed tomography angiography (CTA) contains a contrast bolus tracking system. We explored the diagnostic accuracy of the time-intensity curves given by this automated system to identify right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in acute PE. METHODS: 114 CTAs with a diagnosis of PE were reviewed. RVD was defined as right-to-left ventricular diameter ratio of 1 or greater. Four parameters on time-intensity curves were identified. Parameters between CTAs with and those without RVD were compared with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The ability of the four parameters to discriminate patients with RVD was explored by compiling the area under the operating curves (AUC). RESULTS: The time needed by the contrast media to reach the pulmonary artery [8 seconds (IQR: 7-9) versus 7 seconds (IQR: 6-8), p<0.01], the time needed to reach 40 Hounsfield units (HU) [11 seconds (IQR: 8.5-14) versus 9.5 seconds (IQR: 8-10.5), p<0.01], and the contrast intensity reached after 10 seconds [19 HU (IQR: 4-67) versus 53 HU (IQR: 32-80), p<0.05] were all statistically different between CTA with and CTA without RVD. Those three parameters changed gradually across severity categories of RVD (p<0.05 for trend). Their AUC to identify RVD ranged from 0.63 to 0.66. The slope of contrast intensity over time was not informative: [31 HU/s (IQR: 20-57) in CTA with, compared to 36 HU/s (IQR: 22.5-53) in CTA without RVD, p = 0.60]. CONCLUSION: Several parameters of the time-intensity curve obtained by the bolus tracking system are associated with RVD assessed on CTA images. Of those, the time needed to reach a predefined threshold seems to be the easiest to obtain in any CTA without additional processing time or contrast injection. However, the performance of those parameters is globally low.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=114). Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) vs. No right ventricular dysfunction was evaluated on Time needed to reach 40 Hounsfield units (HU) (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.43, p=<0.01). In patients with acute pulmonary embolism, right ventricular dysfunction was associated with a significantly prolonged time for contrast media to reach 40 Hounsfield units on computed tomography angiography (OR 1.23).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: