The intensity distribution in the 1Σ—3II transition of SiO, observed by Verma and Mulliken, is discussed. The appearance of the subband 1Σ—3II2, which violates the selection rule ΔΩ=0, ±1 and the appearance of the Q branch of the 1Σ—3II0 subband, which violates the selection rule that ΔJ=0 is forbidden for Ω=0→Ω=0 transitions, are explained by the mixing of the 1Σ state with a 1II state as a result of the rotation of the molecule. The effect of spin-orbit interaction is considered only insofar as it mixes singlet functions with the multiplet components of 3IIr. Some indication is given as to why this explanation is inapplicable to the a 3II—X 1Σ+ transition of AlCl where the selection rule for Ω is apparently rigorously obeyed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas C. James (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: