SUMMARY The viability of axillary buds and the growth and potential yield of lateral shoots at nodes of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) infected naturally by Didymella applanata or Botrytis cinerea were measured on excised nodes, decapitated nursery canes or on canes from fruiting plantations. In comparison with lesion‐free nodes, buds at infected nodes were smaller and fewer of them were capable of growth when excised and ‘forced’, although the difference in growth between infected and uninfected nodes decreased during late winter. After February, those buds at infected nodes which were capable of forced growth did so as early and with a similar growth rate as those at lesion‐free nodes. In April, 70% of buds at infected nodes were capable of growth compared with 94% of those at lesion‐free nodes. When nursery canes of cv. Mailing Delight were decapitated above infected nodes the emergence of lateral shoots from the terminal infected node did not differ significantly from that at lesion‐free nodes. On a range of farm sites in Scotland the emergence of shoots at infected nodes in the cropping region of canes was significantly poorer than from uninfected nodes but substantially better at infected nodes of cv. Glen Clova than at those of cvs Mailing Jewel and Mailing Orion. It is suggested that cv. Glen Clova is relatively tolerant of spur blight and cane botrytis. The length and potential yield of laterals which developed at infected nodes in the cropping region of canes in these three cultivars did not differ significantly from those at lesion‐free nodes. In all tests there was no significant difference in growth at nodes infected by D. applanata and B. cinerea which may indicate a common mechanism for suppression of buds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williamson et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: