PURPOSE: To compare a multishot echo-planar fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (EPI-FLAIR) sequence with fast spin-echo FLAIR (F-FLAIR) and fast spin-echo T2-weighted (FSE-T2W) sequences in depiction of white matter lesions. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with various white matter lesions were included in this prospective study. Two independent readers for lesion detection (lesion size, >2 mm) compared sequences quantitatively. In 22 patients, contrast was calculated between periventricular hyperintensity (PVH) and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). RESULTS: EPI-FLAIR revealed more lesions than FSE-T2W (p < 0.01). However, F-FLAIR revealed more lesions than EPI-FLAIR (p < 0.01). For PVH-to-CSF contrast, EPI-FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher contrast than FSE-T2W. There were no differences in PVH-to-CSF contrast between EPI-FLAIR and F-FLAIR. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that EPI-FLAIR has distinct advantages over FSE-T2W in the depiction of white matter lesions. Although EPI-FLAIR reduces imaging time by more than 60% relative to F-FLAIR, it cannot replace F-FLAIR for the detection of lesions in the cerebral white matter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomura et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: