A low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) crystallographic analysis has been undertaken to assess the lateral and vertical relaxations for the Cu(100)-(2×{}2)-S surface structure. The motivation was provided by the recent report with angle-resolved photoemission extended fine structure (ARPEFS) by Bahr et al. [Phys. Rev. B 35, 3773 (1987)]. It was found that the surface structure given by ARPEFS does not account well for the measured LEED intensity curves, although these curves can be reasonably accommodated by a structural model with components of relaxation in some opposite senses to those previously reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: