Key result
Women remain heavily underrepresented in sports and exercise medicine research authorship, editorial boards, and academic leadership, highlighting the need for proactive measures to achieve gender equity.
This editorial highlights the ongoing underrepresentation of women in Sports and Exercise Medicine research and discusses potential solutions.
Watching the Olympic and Paralympics Games, we notice that both men and women achieve world-class performances. We see the world’s best sports stars perform extraordinary athletic feats, regardless of who they are or where they come from. This equity was not always present at this world stage. For instance, until 1984, women were prohibited from running marathons during the Olympic Games.1 It may also surprise you that it was not until the 2012 London Games that all delegations sent a team consisting of both sexes.Over the last decades, the Olympic and Paralympic movements have worked proactively for equity through leadership development and advocacy campaigns, leading to opportunities for women to also become sports stars. Nonetheless, it appears that we in Sports and Exercise Medicine (SEM) are falling behind. Although most of us aim for equity and equivalence, women are still heavily underrepresented in SEM research. In this editorial, we discuss existing concerns and possible solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fagher et al. (2022) conducted an editorial in Gender inequality in sports and exercise medicine research. Women remain heavily underrepresented in sports and exercise medicine research authorship, editorial boards, and academic leadership, highlighting the need for proactive measures to achieve gender equity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: