Randomized double-blind trial demonstrates no reduction in acute mountain sickness incidence among healthy climbers, indicating that oral antioxidants do not prevent altitude illness.
BACKGROUND: Acute mountain sickness may be caused by cerebrovascular fluid leakage due to oxidative damage to the endothelium. This may be reduced by oral antioxidant supplementation. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of antioxidant supplementation for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS). DESIGN: A parallel-group double blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: The study was conducted in a university clinical research facility and a high altitude research laboratory. Eighty-three healthy lowland volunteers ascended to 5200 m on the Apex 2 high altitude research expedition. The treatment group received a daily dose of 1 g l-ascorbic acid, 400 IU of alpha-tocopherol acetate and 600 mg of alpha-lipoic acid (Cultech Ltd., Wales, UK) in four divided doses. Prevalence of AMS was measured using the Lake Louise Consensus score sheet (LLS). Secondary outcomes were AMS severity measured using a novel visual analogue scale, arterial oxygen saturation and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). RESULTS: Forty-one subjects were allocated to the antioxidant group, and 42 to the placebo group. There was no difference in AMS incidence or severity between the antioxidant and placebo groups using the LLS at any time at high altitude. At the pre-determined comparison point at Day 2 at 5200 m, 69% of the antioxidant group (25/36) and 66% of the placebo group (23/35) had AMS using the LLS criteria (P = 0.74). No differences were observed between the groups for PASP, oxygen saturation, presence of a pericardial effusion or AMS assessed by VAS. CONCLUSION: This trial found no evidence of benefit from antioxidant supplementation at high altitude. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00664001.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baillie et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: