Key result
Implementation of a safe preoperative block process and revised time-out checklist increased compliance with a correct time-out from 20% to 85%.
Why the study?
Does the implementation of a safe preoperative block process with a time-out checklist improve compliance with safety protocols in patients undergoing regional nerve blocks?
Does the implementation of a safe preoperative block process with a time-out checklist improve compliance with safety protocols in patients undergoing regional nerve blocks?
Implementation of a multidisciplinary preoperative block process and time-out checklist significantly improved compliance with safety protocols for regional nerve blocks.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Procedural time-outs and checklists are proven to be an effective means of improving teamwork and preventing wrong-sided procedures. The main objective of this study was to ensure that all regional nerve blocks being performed in the preoperative area at our hospital were executed with a proper time-out. The goal of this project was to increase integration of a safe preoperative block process including a time-out checklist to ensure; complete consents, correct patient and laterality were marked prior to each procedure. We focused on recognising events that took place before, during and after the nerve block including non-compliance with the checklist and deviations from protocol. METHODS: A safe preoperative block process current and future state flowchart, revised time-out checklist and action/implementation plan as part of our Plan-Do-Study-Act model was constructed using a multidisciplinary approach. Pre-implementation and post- implementation data were collected by medical students acting anonymously via direct observation noting the presence of an anaesthesiologist, resident, nurse, time-out for procedure, checklist completed and procedure start and sedation time representing a complete time-out. RESULTS: The direct observations in the pre-implementation group showed a 20% (3/15) compliance with a correct time-out. The direct observations in the post implementation group showed 85% (12/14) compliance. This revealed a 65% increase in all portions of the time-out checklist completed. Comparative analysis confirmed decrease in non-compliance and deviations from protocol as displayed by 65% increase in all portions of time-out checklist completed. CONCLUSION: We aimed to improve safety, communication and compliance for preoperative nerve blocks through development and implementation of a safe preoperative block process using a multidisciplinary model. We conclude that creation of a safe nerve block was achieved by integration of a preoperative nerve block process which included increased compliance to the time-out checklist, verifying patients and laterality with marking of patient prior to each procedure, identifying proper consents were completed and ensuring each regional nerve block was executed with a proper time-out.
Time-out checklists may enhance safety processes for preoperative nerve blocks; leaves open need for randomized outcome trials before wider adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arbizo et al. (2022) studied Preoperative regional nerve blocks (n=29). Safe preoperative block process and revised time-out checklist vs. Pre-implementation standard care was evaluated on Compliance with a correct time-out. Implementation of a safe preoperative block process and revised time-out checklist increased compliance with a correct time-out from 20% to 85%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: