Objective Pesticide self-poisoning is a major global public health issue, yet the post-discharge mental health of survivors remains poorly characterized. To investigate the physical and mental health among survivors of diquat self-poisoning after returning to the community, which informs the effective prevention and intervention measures of repeated suicide. Methods A follow-up study of 25 patients with acute diquat self-poisoning was enrolled from Guangzhou twelfth people’s hospital during 2017 to 2023. The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated using the MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), and anxiety and depression were, respectively, assessed using Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scales. Results Twenty-five (25) diquat self-poisoning patients were enrolled in a follow-up study, with a median follow-up of 1.58 person-years. Most participants had low scores in mental health of the HRQoL survey, with a median score was 108.15. In SF-36 domains, only Role Physical (RP) scored significantly lower in the high-dose group ( p = 0.04). Persistent neurological issues (fatigue, forgetfulness, headache) were the primary physical complaints. HRQoL total scores were significantly shaped by sleep duration, history of major trauma, left-behind child status, and psychological symptoms ( p < 0.05). Anxiety and depression symptoms had high prevalent rates of 56 and 68%, respectively. Stratified analysis by toxic dose [low-dose (≤ 50 mL, n = 12) vs. high-dose (> 50 mL, n = 13)] revealed no statistically significant differences in anxiety or depression rates. Conclusion Diquat self-poisoning survivors may experience persistent physical and psychological health difficulties after returning to the community, warranting further attention. The findings highlighted that prevention of repeated self-harm is still necessary among at-risk populations after returning to the community, particularly adolescents and young adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: