Key result
Random Forest achieves ~85% accuracy for cardiovascular disease prediction, outperforming other machine learning models.
Why the study?
Early detection and prediction of cardiovascular disease require accurate clinical data analysis, and the potential of machine learning algorithms to improve diagnosis and treatment is essential.
Cross-Sectional (n=518)
Yes
The random forest algorithm demonstrated the highest accuracy (85.01%) and sensitivity (92.11%) among tested machine learning models for cardiovascular disease prediction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform ML model selection for CVD prediction; leaves open need for external validation before clinical use.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a life-threatening disease rising considerably in the world. Early detection and prediction of CVD as well as other heart diseases might protect many lives. This requires tact clinical data analysis. The potential of predictive machine learning algorithms to develop the doctor’s perception is essential to all stakeholders in the health sector since it can augment the efforts of doctors to have a healthier climate for patient diagnosis and treatment. We used the machine learning (ML) algorithm to carry out a significant explanation for accurate prediction and decision-making for CVD patients. Simple random sampling was used to select heart disease patients from the Khyber Teaching Hospital and Lady Reading Hospital, Pakistan. ML methods such as decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), Naïve Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM) were implemented for classification and prediction purposes for CVD patients in Pakistan. We performed exploratory analysis and experimental output analysis for all algorithms. We also estimated the confusion matrix and recursive operating characteristic curve for all algorithms. performance of the proposed ML algorithm was estimated using numerous conditions to recognize the most suitable machine learning algorithm in the class of models. RF algorithm had the highest accuracy of prediction, sensitivity, and recursive operative characteristic curve of 85.01%, 92.11%, and 87.73%, respectively, for CVD. It also had the least specificity and misclassification errors of 43.48% and 8.70%, respectively, for CVD. These results indicated that the RF algorithm is the most appropriate algorithm for CVD classification and prediction. Our proposed model can be implemented in all settings worldwide in the health sector for disease classification and prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelhafeez et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular Disease (n=518). Random Forest (RF) machine learning algorithm vs. Other machine learning algorithms (Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression) was evaluated on Prediction accuracy for cardiovascular disease (95% CI 0.6608-0.8043). The Random Forest algorithm achieved the highest prediction accuracy of 85.01% for cardiovascular disease compared to other evaluated machine learning models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: