Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electronic structure, hardness (η), and chemical potential (μ) for the 1 A‘ and 3 A‘‘ states of HNO−HON and the 2 A‘‘ state of HSO−HOS have been calculated using HF/6-311++G** and B3LYP/6-311++G** methods. The η and μ profiles of the 1 A‘ state of HNO−HON and those of HSO−HOS are obtained in agreement with the salient features of the maximum hardness principle (MHP). However, a quite erratic η profile is predicted for the 3 A‘‘ state of HNO−HON. This can be attributed to the nature of the variation in the energy difference of the two states along the reaction path. The relative energies, ionization potentials ( I ), and electron affinities ( A ) are calculated at the stationary points of the B3LYP surface using B3LYP and MPn (Full) methods. Most of these values are obtained in very good agreement with the available experimental data. The η values based on these I and A identify the most stable species correctly but do not follow the expected trend with regard to the relative stability of the transition state. The reason for this anomaly is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kar et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: