INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer surgery typically involves mastectomy or lumpectomy, both of which may affect health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of mastectomy compared to lumpectomy on HR-QoL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included patients undergoing mastectomy or lumpectomy between 2016 and 2019. HR-QoL was assessed preoperatively, and at one and two years postoperatively using the BREAST-Q and RAND-36 questionnaire. Linear mixed models were used to analyze changes over time and differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients were included: 385 (80.2%) underwent lumpectomy and 95 (19.8%) mastectomy. BREAST-Q satisfaction with breast(s) scores in the lumpectomy group increased significantly, from 62.2 ± 2.3 at baseline to 73.2 ± 2.4 two years postoperatively (P < 0.001). In the mastectomy group, scores improved at one year and no further increase was seen between one and two years follow-up. Physical well-being scores remained stable over time following mastectomy, whereas a significant improvement was observed after lumpectomy between one and two years (75.9 ± 1.5 vs 79.7 ± 1, P < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement over time in the RAND-36 health change and social functioning. No significant differences were found between the groups for psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being or any of the RAND-36 domains. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term HR-QoL outcomes were largely comparable between patients undergoing lumpectomy and mastectomy. The only consistent difference was the higher BREAST-Q satisfaction with breasts scores observed in the lumpectomy group. As overall HR-QoL remained largely comparable between groups, treatment decisions should first be guided by oncological safety. Within these oncological boundaries, shared decision-making should incorporate patient preferences, recovery expectations, and the potential need for additional treatments or breast reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: