Key result
Morning driving activates sympathetic tone, whereas afternoon driving selectively stimulates the parasympathetic nervous system.
Why the study?
Driving fatigue is a common cause of traffic accidents and is thought to be influenced by immobilization-induced hemodynamic changes during driving, but physiological changes during different times of day are not well characterized.
Does a 90-min simulated driving task induce different physiological and fatigue changes when performed in the morning versus the afternoon in young men?
RCT (n=40)
Randomly divided
Does a 90-min simulated driving task induce different physiological and fatigue changes when performed in the morning versus the afternoon in young men?
Simulated driving tasks induce significant physiological changes, with distinct autonomic nervous system responses depending on whether the task is performed in the morning or afternoon.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Time-of-day effects warrant consideration in driving fatigue protocols; extends evidence of circadian autonomic modulation to 90-min tasks.
Introduction: Driving fatigue is one of the most common causes for traffic accidents. Immobilization of legs, hip, and waist is thought to play a major role in driving fatigue, as it hinders blood circulation and induce hemodynamic changes. Objective: the objective of the study was to monitor changes in physiological parameters before and after in-door simulated driving tasks conducted in the morning as well as afternoon sessions. Methods: 40 young male subjects were randomly divided into morning (group A) and afternoon (group B) sessions and participated in the 90-min simulated in-door driving task. Before and after the task, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters were measured using a novel wrist monitor ANSWatch® which utilized built-in bio-sensors in the cuff to acquire radial pulse waves directly. Palm temperatures were measured by a high-precision thermometer. A questionnaire ranking driving fatigue was filled by each volunteer before and after the driving task. Results: (1) From paired t-tests, both the morning and afternoon driving tasks caused decreases in HR and palm temperatures, and increases in HRV and VLF(AU) (Very low frequency(absolute unit)); For the morning session, LF(AU) (Low frequency(absolute unit)) and LF(NU)(Low frequency(normalized unit)) increased while HF(NU) (High frequency(normalized unit)) decreased; In contrast, LF(NU) and LF/HF decreased while HF(NU) increased for the afternoon session (all changes p<0.05). Systolic pressure was maintained in the morning session but dropped in the afternoon session (p<0.05). (2) From one-way and two-way MANOVA analyses, there was no significant difference between morning and afternoon session for the entire group of physiological parameters measured before or after driving tasks; However, LF(AU), LF(NU), and LF/HF three individual parameters measured before driving were higher in the afternoon session than in the morning session (p<0.05). (3) From written questionnaire, all subjects felt some degree of fatigue following the driving task. No statistical difference existed between the two driving sessions in terms of fatigue score baseline or score change due to driving. Conclusion: Multiple physiological parameters showed significant changes after simulated driving tasks. Distinct trends were found between the two driving sessions. In the morning session, poor circulation in the lower body (limbs, abdomen, and hip) caused decrease in palm temperatures and HR, but BP were maintained due to activation of the sympathetic nervous system as evidenced by increased HRV, LF(AU), and LF(NU). For the afternoon session, palm temperatures, HR and systolic pressure were all lowered. Parasympathetic nervous system was activated [indicated by increased HF(NU)] prompting the body to enter a sleepy state, which greatly increases accident risks in actual road driving. Monitoring of multiple physiological parameters in the study had gained great insight into mechanisms of homeo-stasis and provided a foundation in the future work to quantify driving fatigue in terms of degree of deviation from homeostatic states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Driving fatigue (n=40). Morning simulated driving task vs. Afternoon simulated driving task was evaluated on Changes in physiological parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability, palm temperatures) (p=<0.05). A 90-minute simulated driving task induced distinct physiological changes, with morning sessions activating the sympathetic and afternoon sessions activating the parasympathetic nervous system (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: