Key result
Engagement in a biopsychosocial screening program was associated with significantly fewer hospital admissions compared to non-participation (8% vs 32%, P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does participation in a biopsychosocial screening program reduce hospital admissions and length of stay in patients with cancer?
Cohort (n=1,014)
No
Does participation in a biopsychosocial screening program reduce hospital admissions and length of stay in patients with cancer?
Engagement in a biopsychosocial screening program is associated with significantly reduced hospital admissions and length of stay among patients with cancer.
Supports biopsychosocial screening in cancer; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The integration of a biopsychosocial screening (BPS) program has been proposed by international agencies to better identify and effectively manage unmet needs among patients with cancer. We sought to evaluate the effect of a BPS program on hospital admissions and length of stay (LOS) among a diverse sample of patients with cancer and receiving treatment in Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed from March 2020 to December 2021. Eligible patients were diagnosed with cancer and were receiving treatment at a private practice in Brazil. Clinical characteristics, participation in the BPS program, hospital admissions, reason, and LOS in hospital were evaluated. We compared the number of hospital admissions and LOS between groups (participation v no participation). T test and Chi-square test were used to test for differences between groups. RESULTS: A total of 1,014 patients were included in the analysis. Baseline clinical characteristics were well balanced between groups (n = 459 patients who participated and n = 555 patients who did not). The median age of patients was 63 years. Breast and hematological cancers were the most common types of cancer; 60% were diagnosed at an advanced disease stage. A smaller proportion of patients who participated in the BPS program were hospitalized compared with patients who did not participate (8% v 32%, P = .001). Patients who participated in the program also spent less days in the hospital compared with patients who did not participate in the program (M = 4.2 days v 9.8 days, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Engagement in a BPS program was associated with reduced hospital admissions and LOS. This study provides novel insight into the potential broader implications of BPS programs for clinical care systems. Future studies are needed to explore the mechanisms behind such associations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergerot et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cancer (n=1,014). Biopsychosocial screening (BPS) program vs. No participation was evaluated on Hospital admissions (p=0.001). Engagement in a biopsychosocial screening program was associated with significantly fewer hospital admissions compared to non-participation (8% vs 32%, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: