Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The functional relationship between the T cell-derived helper factor responsible for the induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and for the triggering of B cells to form antibody-producing cells was analyzed. The cell-free supernatant (CFS) from PPD-stimulated Tbc-primed T cell culture contained both a killer-helper factor acting on CTL precursors and a T cell-replacing factor (TRF) causing B cell triggering. In the presence of the CFS, thymocytes generated efficient CTL responses against TNP-modified syngeneic target cells. Although CFS acts on thymocytes across the H-2 barrier, killer T cells that are induced act on the target cells in an H-2 restricted manner. Among the thymocyte subsets, peanut agglutinin-binding (PNA+) thymocytes were capable of generating CTL responses, this being contingent on the presence of factor. The T cells producing the killer-helper factor are sensitive to treatment with both anti-Lyt 1 and anti-la antiserum plus complement. Functional analysis of the T cell-derived factors mediating such activities revealed that killer-helper factor and TRF act on mutually distinct acceptor sites on the CTL precursors and B cells, respectively. This was substantiated by the facts that 1) thymocytes from TRF-nonresponder DBA/2Ha mice, whose B cells are genetically defective in the TRF-acceptor site, were able to respond to killer-helper factor and generate killer T cells, and 2) (DBA/2Ha × BALB/c)F1 male anti-BALB/c B cell antiserum, which contains specific antibody for the TRF-acceptor site on responder B cells, blocked TRF action on B cells but did not inhibit the activity of killer-helper factor in relation to CTL-precursors. Moreover, that these activities are mediated by functionally distinct molecules was indicated by the facts that 1) the activity of the killer-helper factor was lost after absorption with Con A-blasts from splenic T cells but not after absorption with splenic antigen-primed B cells, whereas TRF activity was absorbed out when using the latter but not the former cell type, and, 2) the CFS from TRF-producing monoclonal hybridoma T cells did not exert killer-helper activity. These results indicate that the T cell-derived helper factor responsible for the CTL response is distinct from the TRF responsible for B cell triggering, and that the acceptor sites for the respective factors are under distinctly separate gene control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamaoka et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: