Key result
Intravenous L-DOPA methyl ester produced an equivalent clinical response to L-DOPA in reversing motor deficits, though higher infusion rates were required to maintain continuous effect.
Why the study?
Does intravenous L-DOPA methyl ester improve motor deficits and have similar pharmacokinetics compared to L-DOPA in patients with Parkinson's disease?
Does intravenous L-DOPA methyl ester improve motor deficits and have similar pharmacokinetics compared to L-DOPA in patients with Parkinson's disease?
Intravenous L-DOPA methyl ester is effective in reversing motor deficits in Parkinson's disease but requires higher infusion rates than L-DOPA for continuous effect due to different pharmacokinetic handling.
May require higher infusion rates for continuous effect in PD; hypothesis-generating for methyl ester pharmacokinetics in larger studies.
In six patients with Parkinson's disease exhibiting severe "on-off" phenomena, a 200-mg intravenous bolus of either L-DOPA or of its methyl ester were equally effective in reversing motor deficits, although the duration of action of the methyl ester was shorter. There were no marked differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for L-DOPA plasma levels after administration of L-DOPA and the methyl ester. In three patients, optimal infusion rates for the maintenance of mobility were established for L-DOPA and L-DOPA methyl ester. Both drugs were able to maintain patients "on" throughout a 12-h infusion period. However, on average the optimal infusion rate of L-DOPA methyl ester was 2.7 times greater than that for L-DOPA. There was no marked difference in the plasma levels of L-DOPA achieved, but 3-O-methyl DOPA levels increased more after infusion of L-DOPA methyl ester than after infusion of L-DOPA itself. The half-life of elimination and volume of distribution of L-DOPA formed from the methyl ester were markedly increased compared with values obtained after either an intravenous bolus of methyl ester or after an intravenous infusion of L-DOPA itself. An intravenous bolus of L-DOPA methyl ester produces an equivalent magnitude of clinical response to the same dose of L-DOPA. However, higher optimal infusion rates of methyl ester than L-DOPA are required to produce continuous effect. The pharmacokinetic handling of L-DOPA methyl ester given by intravenous infusion may differ from that of L-DOPA when given by the same route.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stocchi et al. (1992) studied Parkinson's disease (n=6). L-DOPA methyl ester vs. L-DOPA was evaluated on Reversal of motor deficits and maintenance of mobility. Intravenous L-DOPA methyl ester produced an equivalent clinical response to L-DOPA in reversing motor deficits, though higher infusion rates were required to maintain continuous effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: