While the qualitative effects of grid misalignment are known, we have quantified the effect of different degrees of grid misalignment on image contrast and patient exposure. Radiographs were made of a phantom consisting of five lead disks on top of a 15 cm block of lucite. Four 60 lines/cm grids, having grid ratios of 3:1, 4:1, 6:1, and 8:1 were used. When the tube was angled more than three degrees across the grid lines, the contrast improvement factor decreased substantially for all four grids, as much as 46% for an 8:1 grid with a 12 degrees misalignment. There was a concomitant decrease in film optical density, which if compensated for by an increase in patient exposure, would lead to a higher effective bucky factor. With the exception of the 3:1 grid, if the grid is misaligned by more than 6 degrees, higher signal-to-noise ratios can be attained by removing the grid and using the increased patient exposure to reduce noise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlin et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: