Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Standardized reporting is a key component of quality in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy, particularly for advanced procedures. However, reporting of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, video capsule endoscopy, and device-assisted enteroscopy remains heterogeneous, with limited pediatric-specific standardization. We aimed to develop consensus-based advanced reporting standards for these procedures. METHODS: A Delphi consensus was conducted by the SIGENP Endoscopy Working Group, involving 34 pediatric endoscopy experts. Panelists rated structured statements using a 6-point Likert scale. Consensus required both a mean score ≥5.0 and ≥70% agreement. This companion manuscript presents the results for pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, video capsule endoscopy, and device-assisted enteroscopy reporting. RESULTS: Fifty statements were evaluated across the three advanced topics, of which 47 achieved consensus after up to two Delphi rounds. Approved recommendations addressed procedure-specific descriptors, classifications, and technical reporting elements for pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, core reporting domains for pediatric video capsule endoscopy, and technical and procedural elements of device-assisted enteroscopy. Three statements were not retained. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide a practical consensus-based framework for advanced pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy reporting. Their implementation may improve report completeness, promote procedural standardization, enhance multicenter comparability, and support quality improvement across centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiaro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: