Key result
Primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty resulted in a significantly higher mean Harris hip score at 1 year compared to proximal femoral nailing (85.55 vs 77.03, p=0.001) in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
Why the study?
Does primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty improve functional outcomes compared to internal fixation with proximal femoral nailing in elderly osteoporotic patients with unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures?
Cohort (n=54)
No
Does primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty improve functional outcomes compared to internal fixation with proximal femoral nailing in elderly osteoporotic patients with unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures?
In elderly osteoporotic patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty provides better functional outcomes and earlier mobilization compared to proximal femoral nailing.
May guide fixation choice for unstable intertrochanteric fractures; extends RCT evidence on early mobilization in elderly.
Backround: Intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly pose certain special problems and need to be addressed in a balanced way as on one hand senile osteoporosis requires prolonged immobilization, on the other hand rapid mobilization is required as they are generally medically compromised due to age and associated diseases. Despite several randomized trials and comparative studies treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients is still controversial, which we want to investigate in this set-up which caters to a vast rural population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 54 patients, of which 27 each were operated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BPA) and proximal femur nail (PFN) between January 2012 till July 2016 was done. Primary outcome was assessed in both groups using Harris hip score( HHS) at 4weeks, 6 weeks, 12weeks, 6months and 1 year on outpatient basis. The secondary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical time, bed to chair time, chair to walking time, limb length discrepancy at final follow up. All complications were noted at follow ups. Results: The HHS was significantly higher for BPA group at all follow ups, at 4 weeks of follow up was 77.81 for BPA and 71.18 for PFN (p-value = 0.001) and at 1 year of follow up was 85.55 for BPA and 77.03 for PFN (p-value = 0.001). Statistically significant differences were found between BPA and PFN groups with reference to intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical time, bed to chair time, chair to walking time, limb length discrepancy at final follow up. Conclusion: The bipolar hemiarthroplasty group had fewer complications and earlier mobilization with better Harris hip score at all follow ups, which indicate bipolar hemiarthroplasty is a better option in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in senile osteoporotic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture in elderly osteoporotic patients (n=54). Primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BPA) vs. Proximal femoral nailing (PFN) was evaluated on Harris hip score (HHS) at 1 year (p=0.001). Primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty resulted in a significantly higher mean Harris hip score at 1 year compared to proximal femoral nailing (85.55 vs 77.03, p=0.001) in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: