Key result
Cilostazol fails to improve arterial stiffness vs. placebo in patients with T2D and metabolic syndrome.
Why the study?
The effect of cilostazol on arterial stiffness and vascular inflammation markers in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome was not well known.
Does cilostazol improve arterial stiffness and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome?
RCT (n=45)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does cilostazol improve arterial stiffness and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome?
Short-term cilostazol treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome significantly reduced sVCAM-1 levels but did not improve arterial stiffness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support cilostazol for arterial stiffness in T2DM with MetS; leaves open larger outcome trials on vascular effects.
BACKGROUND: The phosphodiesterase inhibitor cilostazol has beneficial effects on atherosclerosis by virtue of vasodilatory and antiplatelet effects. However, less is known about the effect of cilostazol on arterial stiffness and biochemical markers related to vascular inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 45 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome were randomly assigned to either the cilostazol group (50 mg for 2 weeks, 100 mg for 6 weeks) or placebo group for an 8-week treatment phase, and then crossed over. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and serum levels of inflammatory cytokines and vascular cellular adhesion molecules were measured before and after each treatment phase. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo group, the mean baPWV did not improve in the cilostazol group (mean difference 31.42 cm/sec, 95% CI -55.67 to 118.5). Cilostazol treatment significantly reduced soluble vascular cellular adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) level (from 1288.7 ± 285.6 to 1168.2 ± 252.3 ng/dL, P = 0.0003), and there was also significant mean difference between groups (mean difference 105.18 ng/dL, 95% CI 10.65 to 199.71). However, other biochemical markers including lipid profiles, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, adiponectin, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 did not improve with cilostazol treatment. CONCLUSION: Cilostazol treatment significantly reduced serum sVCAM-1 level, but this short term treatment was not associated with beneficial effect on arterial stiffness and other inflammatory markers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (Clinical trial reg. no. NCT00573950, clinicaltrials.gov.).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes with metabolic syndrome (n=45). Cilostazol vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in arterial stiffness measured by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) (MD 31.42, 95% CI -55.67 to 118.5, p=0.47). Cilostazol treatment for 8 weeks did not significantly improve arterial stiffness measured by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity compared to placebo (MD 31.42 cm/sec) in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: