Two novel ruthenium-based olefin metathesis catalysts, H(2)ITap(PCy(3))Cl(2)Ru[double bond, length as m-dash]CH-Ph and H(2)ITapCl(2)Ru[double bond, length as m-dash]CH-(C(6)H(4)-O-iPr) (H(2)ITap = 1,3-bis(2',6'-dimethyl-4'-dimethylaminophenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazol-2-ylidene), were synthesized bearing a pH-responsive NHC ligand with two aromatic NMe(2) groups. The crystal structures of complexes and were determined via X-ray crystallography. Both catalysts perform ring opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of cyclooctene (COE) at faster rates than their commercially available counterparts H(2)IMes(PCy(3))Cl(2)Ru[double bond, length as m-dash]CH-Ph and H(2)IMesCl(2)Ru[double bond, length as m-dash]CH-(C(6)H(4)-O-iPr) (H(2)IMes = 1,3-bis(2',4',6'-trimethylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazol-2-ylidene) and perform at similar rates during ring closing metathesis (RCM) of diethyldiallylmalonate (DEDAM). Upon addition of 2 equiv. of HCl, catalyst is converted into a mixture of several mono and diprotonated Ru-carbene species 12' which are soluble in methanol but degrade within a few hours at room temperature. Catalyst can be protonated with 2 equiv. of HCl and the resulting complex is moderately water-soluble. The complex is stable in aqueous solution in air for >4 h, but over prolonged periods of time shows degradation in acidic media due to hydrolysis of the NHC-Ru bond. Catalysts and perform RCM of diallylmalonic acid in acidic protic media with only moderate activity at 50 degrees C and do not produce polymer in the ROMP of cationic 7-oxanorbornene derivative under the same conditions. Catalyst was used for Ru-seperation studies when RCM of DEDAM or 3,3-diallypentadione (DAP) was conducted in low-polar organic solution and the Ru-species was subsequently precipitated by addition of strong acid. The Ru-species were removed by (1) filtration and (2) filtration and subsequent extraction with water. The residual Ru-levels could be reduced to as far as 11 ppm (method 2) and 24 ppm (method 1) without the use of chromatography or other scavenging methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balof et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: