Key result
Ross-Konno procedure offers reliable mid-term durability and hemodynamics for infant aortic valve replacement.
Why the study?
Replacement of the aortic valve in neonates and infants requires evaluation of the Ross-Konno procedure's outcomes and its dependence on pre-procedural condition.
The Ross-Konno procedure is an effective surgical option for neonates and infants requiring aortic valve replacement, offering good mid-term durability and potential long-term benefits for the autograft.
May support use in select neonates/infants; leaves open need for prospective durability data.
When replacement of the aortic valve in neonates and infants is required, the Ross-Konno procedure provides a high-quality left ventricular outflow with good mid-term durability. The procedural outcome is highly dependent on the pre-procedural condition of the neonate or infant. Most series contain substantial numbers of post-balloon valvotomy patients as emergent or urgent management of severe, acute regurgitation. In patients with compromised ventricular function, post-operative mechanical support may be required but is generally associated with a good outcome. The neonatal and infant autograft may perform better in the long term than un-supported autografts performed later in life. Early definitive or delayed treatment of left ventricular outflow tract pathology associated with aortic interruption increasingly involves an infant Ross-Konno. The procedure also has a role in the recruitment of small left ventricles. Concomitant mitral pathology or aortic obstruction magnifies complexity, but the operative approach to the Ross-Konno remains the same.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winlaw et al. (2022) conducted a review in Aortic valve disease requiring replacement. Ross and Ross-Konno procedure was evaluated. The Ross-Konno procedure provides high-quality left ventricular outflow with good mid-term durability for neonates and infants requiring aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: