Objective To describe antivenom use and 24-hour clinical/hemostatic recovery after pediatric Malayan pit viper envenomation in southern Vietnam. Methods We retrospectively studied children aged 1 month–15 years treated during 2011–2020. Cases met direct or presumed species-identification criteria. Severity was recorded at ED arrival and at the treatment-decision assessment; severity-stratified antivenom analyses used the latter. Clinical findings were reassessed at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. Serial laboratory analyses used time-specific available-case denominators. Results Fifty-four children were included; 46 (85.2%) received antivenom. Median door-to-antivenom time was 0.9 h (IQR 0.5–3.9), and bite-to-antivenom time was 12.3 h (IQR 7.6–26.1). No child received more than two administrations. At 24 h, bite-site bleeding was documented absent in 23/25 children (92.0%; 95% CI 75.0–97.8). Among patients with available 24-h laboratory measurements after an abnormal baseline value, INR ≤1.5 occurred in 17/18 (94.4%; 95% CI 74.2–99.0) and fibrinogen >1 g/L in 16/21 (76.2%; 95% CI 54.9–89.4). Acute reactions were mild and uncommon. Fifty-three children (98.1%) were discharged improved; one (1.9%) died. Conclusions Early clinical and laboratory improvement was observed during 24-hour monitoring after antivenom in this retrospective single-center pediatric referral cohort. Findings are descriptive and do not establish antivenom effectiveness or an optimal dosing strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: