Sport scientists (Starkes, Weir, Singh, Hodges, & Kerr, 1999 Starkes, J. L., Weir, P. L., Singh, P., Hodges, N. J. and Kerr, T. 1999. Aging and the retention of sport expertise. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 30: 283–301. [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Starkes, Weir, & Young, 2003 Starkes, J. L., Weir, P. L. and Young, B. W. 2003. “Retaining expertise: What does it take for older athletes to continue to excel?”. In Advances in research on sport expertise Edited by: Starkes, J. L. and Ericsson, K. A. 251–272. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) have suggested that prolonged training is critical for the maintenance of athletic performance even in the face of predicted age-related decline. This study used polynomial regression analyses to examine the relationship between age and running performance in the 1500 and 10,000 metre events. We compared the age and career-longitudinal performances for 15 male Canadian Masters athletes with a cross-sectional sample of performances at different ages. We hypothesized that the 30 years of uninterrupted training characteristic of this longitudinal sample would moderate the patterns of age-related decline (retention hypothesis); alternatively, the cross-sectional data were expected to demonstrate pronounced age-related decline (quadratic hypothesis). Investigators performed multimodel regression analyses on the age and performance data. Based on the absence (for longitudinal data) or presence (for the cross-sectional data) of significant quadratic components in second-order polynomial models, the authors found support for their respective hypotheses. The longitudinal data showed that running performance declined with age in a more linear fashion than did cross-sectional data. Graphical trends showed that the moderation of age-related decline appeared greater for the longitudinal 10 km performances than for the 1500 m event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: