Key result
Pruned Fuzzy KNN matches standard classifier accuracy at ~97% while using 81% less training data.
Why the study?
Large training datasets in fuzzy K-nearest neighbor classifiers for arrhythmia beat classification require high computation time and storage, motivating a more efficient approach.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The proposed PFKNN classifier significantly reduces training data requirements while maintaining high accuracy for ECG arrhythmia beat classification.
Arrhythmia beat classification is an active area of research in ECG based clinical decision support systems. In this paper, Pruned Fuzzy K-nearest neighbor (PFKNN) classifier is proposed to classify six types of beats present in the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database. We have tested our classifier on ~ 103100 beats for six beat types present in the database. Fuzzy KNN (FKNN) can be implemented very easily but large number of training examples used for classification can be very time consuming and requires large storage space. Hence, we have proposed a time efficient Arif-Fayyaz pruning algorithm especially suitable for FKNN which can maintain good classification accuracy with appropriate retained ratio of training data. By using Arif-Fayyaz pruning algorithm with Fuzzy KNN, we have achieved a beat classification accuracy of 97% and geometric mean of sensitivity of 94.5% with only 19% of the total training examples. The accuracy and sensitivity is comparable to FKNN when all the training data is used. Principal Component Analysis is used to further reduce the dimension of feature space from eleven to six without compromising the accuracy and sensitivity. PFKNN was found to robust against noise present in the ECG data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arif et al. (2010) studied Arrhythmia (n=47). Pruned Fuzzy K-nearest neighbor (PFKNN) classifier vs. Standard Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor (FKNN) classifier was evaluated on Beat classification accuracy. The Pruned Fuzzy K-nearest neighbor classifier achieved a beat classification accuracy of 97.32% while retaining only 19% of the training data, demonstrating comparable performance to the standard unpruned classifier.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: