Positional control is fundamental to most manufacturing processes as well as a wide range of other applications. Many types of positional devices have been proposed and used, ranging from robotic arms to Stewart platforms. This paper discusses a new family of six degrees of freedom positional control devices which generally combine simple designs, high stiffness and strength, and a wider range of motion. Stiffness is particularly advantageous in very small (submicron) positional devices as thermal motion is a significant source of positional uncertainty. The stiffness and thermally induced positional uncertainty of three designs - a robotic arm, a Stewart platform, and one member of the new family - are analyzed and compared. The Stewart platform provides the greatest stiffness for a given structural mass but has the most restrictive range of motion. The robotic arm is least stiff. The new proposal combines greater stiffness than the robotic arm with a significantly greater range of motion than the Stewart platform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ralph C. Merkle (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: