Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The second dissociation channel (CS 2 + → CS + ( X 2 Σ) + S( 3 P)) of CS 2 + molecular ions has been investigated by measuring the photofragment CS + excitation (PHOFEX) spectrum in the wavelength range of 385−435 nm, where the CS 2 + molecular ions were prepared purely by [3 + 1] multiphoton ionization of the neutral CS 2 molecules at 483.2 nm. The CS + PHOFEX spectrum was assigned essentially to the CS 2 + ( à 2 Π u ) ← CS 2 + ( X̃ 2 Π g ) transition, such as the S + PHOFEX spectrum, which has been obtained previously. The product branching ratios (CS + /S + ), as measured from the PHOFEX spectra, increase from 0 to slightly larger than 1 in the wavenumber range of 47200−50400 cm -1 . The adiabatic appearance potential of the CS + ion was determined to be 5.852 ± 0.005 eV above the X̃ 2 Π g,3/2 (0,0,0) level of CS 2 + from the appearance wavenumber of 47196.2 cm -1 to produce the CS + ion. The dissociation mechanism to get to CS + + S from CS 2 + was discussed and preliminarily attributed to (i) CS 2 + ( X̃ 2 Π g ) → CS 2 + (à 2 Π u ) through one-photon excitation, (ii) CS 2 + ( à 2 Π u ) → CS 2 + ( X̃ † ) via internal conversion process due to the vibronic coupling between the à and X̃ states, (iii) CS 2 + ( X̃ † ) → CS 2 + ( B̃ 2 Σ u + ) through the second photon excitation, and (iv) CS 2 + ( B̃ 2 Σ u + ) → CS + ( X 2 Σ) + S( 3 P), because of the potential curve crossing with the repulsive 4 Σ - state and/or the 2 Σ - state correlated with the second dissociation limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: