Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a study of the use and limits of the time-delay interferometry null channels for in-flight estimation of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna instrumental noise. The paper considers how the two main limiting noise sources, test-mass acceleration noise and interferometric phase measurement noise, propagate through different time-delay interferometry channels: the Michelson combination X that is the most sensitive to gravitational waves, then the less-sensitive combinations α, and finally the null channel ζ. We note that the null channel ζ, which is known to be equivalent to any null channel, not only has a reduced sensitivity to the gravitational waves, but also features a larger degree of cancellation of the test mass acceleration noise relative to the interferometry noise. This severely limits its use in quantifying the low-frequency instrumental noise in the Michelson X combination, which is expected to be dominated by acceleration noise. However, we show that one can still use in-flight noise estimations from ζ to put an upper bound on the considered noises entering in the X channel, which allows one to distinguish them from a strong stochastic gravitational wave background.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muratore et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: