Key result
Sequential carotid IMT analysis correlates more strongly with Framingham risk than standard image-based tracking.
Why the study?
Current image-based ECG tracked analysis of IMT may have major variations and might underestimate the true relations for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk factors.
Does sequentially based analysis of Intima-Media Thickness improve correlation with cardiovascular risk factors compared to image based analysis in healthy males?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,500)
Single-blind
Does sequentially based analysis of Intima-Media Thickness improve correlation with cardiovascular risk factors compared to image based analysis in healthy males?
Sequentially based analysis of carotid IMT yields higher maximal values and correlates better with cardiovascular risk scores than standard image-based analysis, suggesting the latter may underestimate true risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Current IBA for IMT shows major variations; leaves open whether SBA improves reproducibility before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Image-based B-mode ultrasound has gained popularity in major studies as a non-invasive method of measuring cardio- and cerebrovascular risk factors. However, none of the major studies appears to have paid sufficient attention to the variation in end diastolic wall process. By using sequentially based analyses (SBA) of Intima-Media Thickness (IMT), the general purpose of this study was to show that the current image based (ECG tracked) analysis (IBA) has some major variations and might underestimate the true relations for cardiovascular events and stroke for IMT measurement. METHOD: The study group consisted of 2500 healthy male subjects aged between 35 to 55 years. 4 sequences (300 images) were analyzed per subject. 750,000 images were analysed throughout the course of this study. RESULTS: IBA showed significantly lower mean, maximal, and minimal values for IMT in CCA than for SBA. The correlation analysis between IBA and SBA with the cardio- and cerebrovascular risk factors showed a higher correlation of SBA for all risk factors. The Pearson coefficient was 0.81, p < 0.01, for SBA versus Framingham CHD risk level (FCRL) and 0.49, p = 0.01, for IBA versus FCRL. CONCLUSION: IBA did not measure the true maximal values of the IMT in this study. Together with the correlation analysis, this indicates that IBA might underestimate the true relations for IMT and risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandrock et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy subjects (n=2,500). Sequentially based analysis (SBA) of Intima-Media Thickness vs. Image based analysis (IBA) of Intima-Media Thickness was evaluated on Mean Intima-Media Thickness (left + right CCA) in mm (MD 0.05, 95% CI 0.03-0.06, p=<0.01). Sequentially based analysis of carotid intima-media thickness yielded significantly higher mean values (0.67 vs 0.63 mm) and a stronger correlation with Framingham CHD risk (r=0.81 vs r=0.49) compared to standard image-based analysis.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: