Supraglacial lakes are widely distributed across the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) each summer. The resulting meltwater-enhanced ablation effect plays a critical role in understanding the GrIS surface mass balance but remains poorly quantified. Inspired by the insight that longer meltwater persistence leads to stronger meltwater-enhanced ablation, this study proposes a novel method to directly estimate supraglacial lake bottom ablation rates at centimeter-per-day scale using satellite observations. First, we map multi-temporal supraglacial lake extents from Sentinel-2 imagery to estimate cumulative meltwater-covered days. Then, we derive ablation depths at the lake bottom and surrounding bare ice by differencing ICESat-2 repeat track data acquired before and during the melt season. Next, we perform linear fitting between lake bottom ablation depths and cumulative meltwater-covered days along the ICESat-2 tracks to calculate both the lake bottom ablation rate and the bare ice ablation rate. Finally, we evaluate the magnitude of the meltwater-enhanced ablation effect. We apply this method to 26 supraglacial lakes across the GrIS and identify a positive linear relationship between lake bottom ablation depths and cumulative water-covered days (mean Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.70 ± 0.14, p < 0.001). The fitted mean lake bottom ablation rate (4.50 ± 1.15 cm/day) significantly exceeds the mean bare ice ablation rate (1.98 ± 0.52 cm/day). Meltwater in supraglacial lakes therefore enhances ablation rate by ∼ 1.3 ± 0.5 times, with values ranging from 0.6 to 2.4, consistent with previous field measurements (1.1–1.4 times) and numerical model simulations (1.1–1.7 times). In summary, this study provides a first quantitative satellite-based estimate of meltwater-enhanced ablation across the GrIS under varying ablation intensities, and may improve our understanding of GrIS surface melt process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: