This study examines how the state and the market shape income divisions among paid care workers in China's domestic service economy. We develop the concept of the state-led reproductive boundary to examine how state intervention, through certification, training, work arrangement, and long-term care insurance, redraws the lines along which reproductive labour is valued, financed, and protected. Drawing on a 2021 survey of 919 domestic workers in Shanghai, the first Chinese city to implement a municipality-wide long-term care insurance scheme, we distinguish maternity-infant care, eldercare, and non-nurturant work, and model both monthly and hourly income. We compare a purely cultural account of care valuation with one that incorporates the state. Cultural valuation alone cannot explain the wage divisions within paid care. The division between nurturant and non-nurturant work in China is organised less through race than through human capital, certification, and market recognition. Within nurturant work, the maternity-infant care advantage holds in monthly but not hourly terms, since live-in arrangements obscure the low hourly returns of feminised, time-intensive care. The culturally anticipated eldercare penalty does not materialise. Eldercare workers absorbed into the hourly-priced, state-financed insurance scheme are no longer disadvantaged relative to non-nurturant workers, showing that state intervention can partially insulate a culturally devalued form of care from market discounting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: