This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: There is a need to provide a translational evaluation of imipenem–cilastatin as an innovative musculoskeletal embolic agent by assessing its embolization efficacy, physicochemical behavior, and safety profile in a porcine model of intratendinous neovascularization. Materials and Methods: In vitro analyses were performed to assess size distribution and solubility of imipenem–cilastatin in iodinated contrast media (Visipaque®) for two commercial formulations (Tienam® and Sun®). A preclinical study was conducted on six pigs, with neovascularization induced via collagenase injection in the patellar tendon. Each animal received Tienam® embolization with Visipaque® on one side and Visipaque® alone on the contralateral side at D7 post induction, followed by angiographic evaluation at D14. Efficacy was assessed using a four-point neovascularization score. Safety was evaluated through behavioral monitoring and rectal flora analysis. Results: In vitro, imipenem–cilastatin exhibited heterogeneous particle morphology and size: D50 was similar between Tienam® and Sun®, whereas D90 was markedly larger in Tienam® than Sun®, with limited solubility in Visipaque®. In vivo, Tienam® embolization led to variable reductions in neovascularization, ranging from complete to absent response (mean score decrease: 1.3 vs. 0.2 in controls, p = 0.07). Microbiological analysis revealed alterations in the rectal flora of all animals, with emergence of intrinsically carbapenem-resistant environmental species in four pigs, without evidence of acquired resistance. Conclusions: Imipenem–cilastatin demonstrates technical feasibility as a musculoskeletal embolic agent, but its efficacy remains heterogeneous, likely because of crystal irregularity and a broad size distribution. Although the procedure was clinically tolerated, the observed microbiota changes raise concerns regarding long-term safety and broader clinical adoption. Future research should focus on calibrated formulations that preserve embolic efficacy while improving reproducibility and minimizing off-target microbiological impact.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felix et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: