[2] A B table +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+-----+ | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7...| +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+-----+ | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B...| +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+-----+ - Equations for the number "2". +-----------------------+| A x A = A | A² = A || A x B = A | A³ = A || B x B = B | || | B² = B || A + A = A | B³ = B || A + B = B | || B + B = A | |+-----------------------+ When only a frequency of "2" is looked at, these are the equations which it generates. The table at the top right shows where the logic is coming from for this system.The equations here are within the realm of polarity, although there are other archetypes, such as projection & reception, these may also fall into.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony Bell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: